Saturday, March 1, 2014

Stop Shifting the Buck for Deficiencies in Navy

Stop Shifting the Buck for Deficiencies in Navy

The New Indian Express 

28th February 2014


COMMENT :

Capt(retd) H. Balakrishnan,I.N. from Chennai

Sir, 

" It is also vital that the next government wastes no time in modernising the armed forces with acquisition of vital 
equipment ". 

Too long have we heard these pious platitudes. Nothing has happened. 

For your 'wish' to bear fruition - ONE SIMPLE SURGERY IS REQUIRED. 

Throw the 'BABU' out from decision making in Defence preparedness. 

And, for God's sake - will someone in power amend the stupid Business Rules that vest the 'Defence Secretary' with the responsibility of 'Defending India'.

These 'stupid' rules can happen ONLY 'IN MERA BHARAT MAHAN'. 

Why is the Defence Secretary not asked to account for all these mishaps ? 

Regards



--
K.Vijayan
3/2, Vasanth Apts.II, 312, Lloyds Road, Chennai 600014
Vijayan Krishna
To Me
Mar 1 at 6:05 PM


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: balakrishnan hariharan
Date: 1 March 2014 13:02
Subject: MY COMMENT : TNIE EDITORIAL


War Cannot be Fought with Obsolete Hardware


The New Indian Express 

01st March 2014 



Comment :


Sir, 

" The latest accident underscores, among others, the Navy’s poor submarine rescue capabilities. It is the result of neglect of safety in its operations. At the root of the problem is the government’s failure to understand the needs of the forces and provide them the required support in terms of equipment and facilities for training ". 

This self-contradictory statement, reminded me of VKK Menon's order to the then COAS in 1962 ' Fire under any circumstance, but fire only in 
self-defence ' ! 

It has already come out in the open that INS Sindhuratna went for her Task II trials with ' LIFE EXPIRED BATTERIES '.

It was still fitted with the batteries whose service life had expired 15 months ago. The ship didn’t get new batteries because the procurement was delayed by the MoD. 

Who is responsible for this sad state of affairs? 

Clearly a MoD, which is incapable of sanctioning critical consumables like batteries in time or forever has to bear the burden. The file requiring the purchase of new batteries lay under process for years with the MoD. 

Given these facts, your 'PROFORMA' editorial does no justice- either to your paper or to the Navy. 

Time is at hand to name and shame the 'Politico-Babu' nexus of 'AAJ NAHIN - KAL NAHIN - KABHIE NAHIN'. 

In my book - 'Saint'Antony and the Defence Secretaryare 'GUILTY' of murder of the two young officers aboard INS Sindhuratna. 

Your sister paper of date has an interesting analysis entitled : " Committee on Insecurity ". 

Says it all !

Regards

No comments:

Post a Comment